Home

 


Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to Posted on: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 23:16:11 +0000 (UTC)


"Brian Utterback" wrote in message
news:d1feaq$gfi$2@news1brm.Central.Sun.COM...

> Yes, to all of your points. I wasn't dealing with the dispersion
> intervals and jitter and all that. I was just trying to illustrate
> why three servers won't cut it. In reality the offsets shouldn't be
> so large and all that. But if the intervals don't overlap (and they
> often don't) then the example stands.

The assumption is that you have three servers, two of which are working
and one of which is not. If two of them are working, then their intervals
*must* overlap. Obviously if you have three servers and no two of them are
reliable, you are screwed.

DS

34162. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34163. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34164. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34166. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34167. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34168. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34169. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34170. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34171. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34172. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34173. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34174. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34175. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34176. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34177. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34178. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34179. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34180. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34181. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to
34182. Re: Sufficient # servers to sync to